Rain, mud, and wildfires, and to this mix we must add hubris. In some way, all human acts beyond those strictly necessary for survival of self and specie contain some degree of hubris, and building homes that would qualify as mansions on vulnerable hillsides is one highly visible example. That someone would want to live on a hillside, which often come with views of mountains and oceans and valleys, is not hubristic. That someone would engineer a home to allow this to happen is also not hubristic, and these are the iconic homes of California's hillside communities circa 1950. They tend to be low-slung and relatively modest, and they fit themselves into nooks in the hillside that require little to no additional excavating.
It's when the land itself is engineered to accomodate structures that are in themselves hubristic that human hubris shifts exponentially to become akin to a force of nature, and we should worry when this happens. We should worry when our thinking shifts from How do I live on the land? to How do I change the land so it better suits my desires?
In California, evidence of these two mindsets, and the debate that springs up in the gulf between them, can be seen and heard everywhere. One of my favorite restaurants, Memphis, asks the first question when it moves into the structures left behind by a 1960s era gas station and figures out how to make that configuration work. No fortunes will be made at Memphis, but good food is served there, servers make an honest living, and the people who live in the area had their landscape changed very little when the land changed use.
Just down the road, however, is a giant Edwards movie theater that reflects the second mindset. The theater is part of a large outdoor shopping complex that replaced a much more humble mixed-use center. The walls of the theater rise massively from the sidewalk, oblivious to human scale and dimension.
Three weeks later.
It's no longer raining, but the fog has rolled in. I'm new to CdM, so I don't know if this is typical for this time of year. I hope it is--there is something about fog that is very appealing. The way it moves and scatters light. The way it gives air and oxygen intensity that demands you pay attention.
Fog isn't really a singular thing, it's more of a collection of things, of particles each with their own density and mass, and as you move through the fog, they seem to shift and move in response your presence. Fog and mist are things I experienced only occasionally when I lived inland, but now that I can measure the distance from my home to the ocean in feet rather than miles, I am coming to realize that air-borne water--which is what fog and mist are--does amazing things to light, and I like it.


